CRIMINAL LAW DOGMATICS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF CRIME: PROBLEMS OF OPTIMIZING THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE GENERAL PART OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the analysis of the transformation processes in the criminal law dogma caused by the digitalization of crime and the problems of optimizing the institutions of the General part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Key dogmatic categories are considered, including corpus delicti, causality, public danger of the act, and criminal punishment. Special attention is paid to the adaptation of traditional provisions of criminal law to new technological realities, including the use of information and communication technologies for criminal purposes, the need to clarify criteria for public danger and the introduction of restrictions on digital rights and freedoms in the content of punishments. It is concluded that the systematic modernization of the dogmatic institutions of the General Part contributes to improving the effectiveness of criminal law enforcement, the consistency of the General and Special parts of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the implementation of the principles of individual and general prevention.

Keywords:
criminal law dogmatics, digital transformation of crime, General part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, corpus delicti, causal relationship, public danger of crime, objectives of criminal punishment, individual prevention, information and communication technologies
Text
Text (RU) (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Gluhareva L. I. Dogma prava i dogmatichnost' yuridicheskogo myshleniya // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo». 2013. № 19 (120). S. 19–26.

2. Romashov R. A. Ugolovno-pravovaya dogmatika. K voprosu o dogmatike sovremennogo rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava // Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost'. 2019. № 3. S. 11–18.

3. Sych K. A. Pozitivizm v nauke ugolovnogo prava // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2013. № 3. S. 66–68.

4. Piontkovskiy A. A. Nauka ugolovnogo prava, ee predmet, zadachi, soderzhanie i znachenie (1895 g.) // Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy vzglyad. 2007. № 4. S. 61–68.

5. Zhalinskiy A. E. Nauka sovremennogo ugolovnogo prava // Sovremennoe ugolovnoe pravo i kriminologiya. 2007. № 2007. S. 8–17.

6. Romashov R. A. K voprosu o ponimanii fenomenov «prestuplenie» i «sub'ekt prestupleniya» v sovremennoy rossiyskoy yurisprudencii // Vestnik Samarskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2013. № 1 (9). S. 7–9.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?