UDC 34
The article notes that the legal institution of necessary defense has a centuries-old history, however, its use in modern legal practice continues to cause debate. In many scientific judgments, the main diffi-culty is related to the subjectivity of the criteria for assessing the legality of the defender's actions, fixed in legislation. The author analyzes the key requirements for recognizing defense as legitimate. Special attention is paid not only to doctrinal contradictions, but also to the problems faced by competent entities that reconcile law enforcement decisions with the provisions of the Resolution of the Ple-num of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated September 27, 2012 during proceedings on administrative offenses.
lawful behavior, necessary defense, harm, encroachment, negative consequences, defending person.
1. Shveyger A.O. Problemy realizacii neobhodimoy oborony ot administrativnyh pravonarusheniy // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2022. № 4 (99).
2. Admiralova I.A., Kurakin A.V., Lekomcev A.V. Voprosy predmeta administrativnogo prava i policeyskoy deyatel'nosti: sootnoshenie i vzaimodeystvie // Vestnik VIPK MVD Rossii. 2023. № 1 (65).
3. Kisin V.R. Sostoyanie i perspektivy pravovogo regulirovaniya obstoyatel'stv, isklyuchayuschih administrativnuyu deliktnost' deyaniya // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2018. № 10.
4. Kobozev A.A. Istoriko-pravovye predposylki vozniknoveniya policeyskih funkciy v sisteme organov vlasti Drevnerusskogo gosudarstva (IX – seredina XIII vekov) // Vestnik VIPK MVD Rossii. 2023. № 1 (65).
5. Tarakanov I.A., Sigacheva A.K. Neobhodimaya oborona: osobennosti ocenki pravomernosti oboronitel'nyh deystviy ot posyagatel'stva, sopryazhennogo s naneseniem poboev / I.A. Tarakanov // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2021. № 1 (58).
6. Nikulenko A.V., Smirnov M.A. Pravo na neobhodimuyu oboronu pri zaschite imuschestvennyh i lichnyh neimuschestvennyh prav: illyuzornoe ili real'noe // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2024. № 3 (103).
7. Zyryanov S.M. Esche raz ob obschestvennoy opasnosti administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2017. № 6.
8. Garbatovich D.A. Neobhodimaya oborona ot neprestupnyh poboev // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2017. № 6.
9. Shuruhnova D.N., Mendel' A.S. Obstoyatel'stva, isklyuchayuschie administrativnuyu deliktnost' deyaniya i osvobozhdayuschie ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: pravovaya priroda i sudebnoe pravoprimenenie // Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry. 2024. № 3.
10. Garmyshev Ya.V., Ishigeev V.S. Neobhodimaya oborona: problemnye aspekty teorii i praktiki, puti sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva Rossii // Sibirskie ugolovno-processual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. 2023. № 3 (41).
11. Nikulenko A.V. Obschestvennaya opasnost' kak «rudiment» ugolovnogo prava // Obschestvennaya opasnost' v ugolovnom, ugolovno-ispolnitel'nom prave i kriminologii: materialy XIV Rossiyskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2024.
12. Merkur'ev V.V., Tarakanov I.A. Voprosy neobhodimoy oborony v raz'yasneniyah Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii: izmeneniya, obuslovlennye potrebnostyami pravoprimeneniya // Vestnik Universiteta prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2023. № 1 (93).
