Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with this notice and the Terms of Use.
Submit manuscript
Home / Journals / VESTNIK ADVANCED TRAINING INSTITUTE OF THE MIA OF RUSSIA / Issue 3 / ON THE INEXPEDIENCY OF ESTABLISHING THE MINIMUM SIZE OF THE SUBJECT OF LEGALIZATION OF PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY CRIMINAL MEANS
ON THE INEXPEDIENCY OF ESTABLISHING THE MINIMUM SIZE OF THE SUBJECT OF LEGALIZATION OF PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY CRIMINAL MEANS
Submit manuscript Download PDF
Text
To cite
Citations:

ON THE INEXPEDIENCY OF ESTABLISHING THE MINIMUM SIZE OF THE SUBJECT OF LEGALIZATION OF PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY CRIMINAL MEANS
Bahmatov Sergey Vladimirovich 1
Rodichev M. L. 2
Authors:
1.  Mezhregional'noe upravlenie Federal'noy sluzhby po finansovomu monitoringu po Severo-Zapadnomu federal'nomu okrugu

2.  Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii

Russian Federation
Type:
Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29039/2312-7937-2023-3-134-140
eLocation:
Status:
Published
Received:
31.10.2023
Accepted:
02.11.2023
Published:
02.11.2023
Subject area:
UDC 34
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
legalization of property acquired by criminal means; significant size; minimum size; size of legaliza-tion; qualification of crimes; criminal proceeds; fight against legalization; property subject to confiscation; money laundering
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article was prepared within the framework of public scientific controversy about the establish-ment in Articles 174 and 174.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of the minimum size of the subject of legalization (laundering) of funds and other property acquired by criminal means. The authors are critical of the idea of fixing the specified size in the criminal law and give arguments about its inexpediency.

Keywords:
legalization of property acquired by criminal means; significant size; minimum size; size of legaliza-tion; qualification of crimes; criminal proceeds; fight against legalization; property subject to confiscation; money laundering
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Thayshaov Z.A. Legalizaciya (otmyvanie) dohodov, priobretennyh prestupnym putem: zakonodatel'nye i pravoprimenitel'nye aspekty (po materialam sudebnoy praktiki Krasnodarskogo kraya i Respubliki Adygeya): avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. - Krasnodar, 2005.

2. Kurovskaya L.N. Protivodeystvie legalizacii prestupnyh dohodov ugolovno-pravovymi sredstvami. - M.: Yurlitinform, 2006.

3. Emceva K.E. Protivodeystvie legalizacii (otmyvaniyu) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, priobretennogo prestupnym putem: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. - Krasnodar, 2016.

4. Musaev F.A. Prestupleniya protiv obschego poryadka osuschestvleniya predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti (st. 171, 172-174.1 UK RF). Voprosy zakonodatel'noy tehniki i dif-ferenciacii otvetstvennosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. - Kazan', 2005.

5. Sabanina O.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za legalizaciyu (otmyvanie) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, priobretennyh prestupnym putem: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. - Ekaterinburg, 2004.

6. Korostelev S.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za legalizaciyu (otmyvanie) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, priobretennyh prestupnym putem: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. - Habarovsk, 2006.

7. Potockiy N.K., Ivanov A.V. Ponyatie i suschnost' kvalificiruyuschih priznakov lega-lizacii (otmyvaniya) prestupnyh dohodov, t.e. prestupleniy, predusmotrennyh st. 174 i 174.1 UK RF // Gumanitarnye, social'no-ekonomicheskie i obschestvennye nauki. 2021. № 12-2.

8. Ryhlov O.A. Otvetstvennost' za legalizaciyu (otmyvanie) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, priobretennyh prestupnym putem, po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Ros-sii: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. - Chelyabinsk, 2007.

9. Yuschenko I.S. Analiz zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii, Respubliki Belarus' i Respubliki Ukraina v sfere protivodeystviya legalizacii (otmyvaniya) nezakonnyh dohodov: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. - M., 2009.

10. Pikurov N.I., Pudovochkin Yu.E. Problemy kvalifikacii privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za legalizaciyu (otmyvanie) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, pri-obretennyh prestupnym putem. - M.: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet pravosudiya, MUMCFM, 2015.

11. O protivodeystvii legalizacii (otmyvaniyu) dohodov, poluchennyh prestupnym pu-tem, i finansirovaniyu terrorizma [Elektronnyy resurs]: federal'nyy zakon ot 07.08.2001 № 115-FZ // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

12. Oficial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. Svedeniya o sostoyanii prestupnosti v Rossii za 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 i 2022 gody [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: https://xn--b1aew.xn--p1ai/reports (data obrascheniya: 24.04.2023).

13. Zaprutin D.G. Protivodeystvie legalizacii (otmyvaniyu) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, priobretennyh drugimi licami prestupnym putem v Rossii // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sociologii. 2020. № 2.

14. Oficial'nyy sayt Sudebnogo Departamenta pri Verhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Fe-deracii [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://www.cdep.ru/?id=79 (data obrascheniya: 06.04.2023).

15. O sudebnoy praktike po delam o legalizacii (otmyvanii) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, priobretennyh prestupnym putem, i o priobretenii ili sbyte imuschestva, zavedomo dobytogo prestupnym putem [Elektronnyy resurs]: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 07.07.2015 № 32 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

16. Pravoprimenitel'naya praktika po prestupleniyam v sfere nezakonnogo oborota narkotikov, sovershennym s ispol'zovaniem virtual'nyh aktivov. - M.: GUNK MVD Rossii, 2021.

17. Kassacionnoe opredelenie VS RF ot 29.10.2020 № 38-UD20-8-K1 po zhalobe Beshenceva I.V.

18. Rekomendacii FATF: Mezhdunarodnye standarty po protivodeystviyu otmyvaniyu deneg, finansirovaniyu terrorizma i finansirovaniyu rasprostraneniya oruzhiya massovogo unichtozheniya: per. s angl. - M.: MUMCFM, 2012.

© vipkmvd.editorum.ru
Agreement Personal data protection and processing policy Support Powered by Editorum,  Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot password?