Murino, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
VAK Russia 5.1.4
UDC 34
The scientific article examines some procedural guarantees for ensuring the rights of a suspect (ac-cused) in the application of simplified forms of production: an inquiry in an abbreviated form, a spe-cial procedure for judicial proceedings. The terms, participants and possibilities of their actions in the application of simplified forms of proceedings are considered. The author draws attention to the fact that the level of coercion is significantly reduced during production in simplified forms, which is associated with a decrease in the level of opposition to the activities of government entities. The author believes that some procedural guarantees should be expanded by giving the investigator (inquirer) the right to act at his discretion. At the same time, the procedural guarantee associated with giving the public prosecutor the opportunity to object to the satisfaction of the accused's petition for the ap-plication of a special procedure for judicial proceedings is not such, because in practice these objections in most cases are not substantiated, are not motivated and lead to a violation of the accused's right to use a simplified form of proceedings
simplified proceedings, special procedure, rights of the accused, statement of petition, procedural guarantees
1. Golikov S.I. Problemy sudebnogo razbiratel'stva ugolovnyh del v osobom poryadke // Zakonnost'. 2015. № 12.
2. Kasatkina S. A. Priznanie obvinyaemogo: monografiya. – M.: Prospekt, 2010.
3. Krasnyh S.S., Dudorov T.D. Osobyy poryadok sudebnogo razbiratel'stva: realii, pro-blemy, perspektivy // Central'nyy nauchnyy vestnik. 2020. T. 5. № 7-10.
4. Mihaylovskaya I.B. Prava lichnosti – novyy prioritet Ugolovno-processual'nogo ko-deksa Rossiyskoy Federacii // Ros. yusticiya. 2002. № 7.
5. Ovsyannikov I.V. Nesoglasie gosudarstvennogo obvinitelya s primeneniem osobogo po-ryadka sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2020. № 1.
6. Popova E.I. Kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie deyatel'nosti sledovatelya po primeneniyu norm ob osobom poryadke prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya pri soglasii obvinyaemogo s pred'yavlennym emu obvineniem po ugolovnym delam o hischeniyah: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – Krasnodar, 2013.
7. Red'kin N.V., Ivaschenko V.V. Problemnye voprosy proizvodstva sudebnogo razbiratel'stva v osobom poryadke po ugolovnym delam, rassledovannym v forme doznaniya // Ros. sud'ya. 2009. № 9.
8. Remennyh P.N. Teoreticheskie osnovy i praktika primeneniya osobogo poryadka sudebno-go razbiratel'stva: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – Barnaul, 2006.
9. Tenishev A.P. Osobyy poryadok sudebnogo razbiratel'stva v ugolovnom processe Ros-siyskoy Federacii: sootvetstvie principam i sovershenstvovanie processual'noy formy: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2018.
10. Ugolovnoe delo № 1-203/2019 // Arhiv Vyksunskogo gorodskogo suda Nizhegorodskoy oblasti za 2019 god.
11. Ugolovnoe delo № 1-245/2019 // Arhiv Borskogo gorodskogo suda Nizhegorodskoy oblasti za 2019 god.
12. Yarcev R.V. Osobyy poryadok sudebnogo razbiratel'stva: novye podhody ili starye oshibki (na osnove monitoringa zakonodatel'stva i pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti) // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya Pravo. 2020. № 2.
